Sunday Surkhi--Gary andTony have a Baby

While the California Courts continue to solve the conflict of Proposition8 and its opponents, the Same-Sex Married couples enjoy further by having a "baby". (There are other terminologies in the making for 'couples' like 'Domestic Partnerships' or 'State-sanctioned Union'. I wonder what terms would be used for such a 'child'--some modification of such words a s offspring or progeny or brood etc.)
 Huge sums of money are collected and spent for all this fight as well as now for "having a baby".
One of the "couple" used his sperm to impregnate an egg bought in the market (Yes like the usual hen's eggs, now there is a market of human eggs too, just a bit more expensive, say a few thousand times more).
Then they went out hunting an "Uterus" to use as the incubating instrument for "gestation" and sure enough (if you spend enough money you can always find a needy woman to sell that "gestational equipment" God Almighty has provided her for procreation) they secured one and--result---out comes Nicholas, a healthy boy for a healthy same sex couple.
My wording above does tend to be somewhat derisive but forgive me for that and let us consider this a bit more seriously, where the gay marriages are taking our civilization and its impact on those concepts and values that have existed since the times of Adam.
 I missed the documentary of Soledad O'brien, but it obviously painted a picture not only sympathizing but also approving and praising the 'happy healthy family'.
 Evidently Gary and Tony spent a lot of money to achieve their goal of having their "own" child who they are raising together as father and "...............". I see articles in support of this that
"there is no effect on the child's psychology when gay 'parents' raise a child (mostly adopted)"
"why does the society oppose such a union between the same sex persons"
"there will be so much to gain in terms of moneys generated by "additional" marriages (if they are given a legal recognition) for example from taxes the state will obtain. (See how much the state is losing by not recognizing the SSmarriages)

------And the battle of sexes goes on.
     Ethics and morals aside, just consider the woman who sold her uterus+ (after all she 'bore' the child, got through the pains and difficulties of gestation and parturition etc.) only to gain some money for her and her family. She opted to remain behind the scenes. She is after all the "biological mother" of Nicholas (and God knows how many more Nichloases will be brought into this world to please many more Garys and Tonys and may be for example Jennys and Janes)
There will be legal battles fought by the biological mothers to get the baby back and "return" the funds obtained. Psychologically she may feel the attraction for the baby (has happened before).
 The opposite of Gary and Tony, we are going to see Soleded or some such reporter bringing to us a gay couple by the names of Jane and Jenny who will find money to get a "sperm" bought in the market of frozen sperms (preferencially chosen from known super-athletes and therefore high prices paid for the sperm) and either of Jane or Jenny providing the uterus for giving birth to their "own child". Then in future may be their child "Jessica" will go out looking for the absent father, who will most likely fail to recognize his daughter
There are myriads of stories I see developing in our 'civilization' which my children and grand children will see and ?enjoy.
An old man like me, even if not Alzheimer's patient, gets confused, can you blame me?

Please visit my Urdu blog at http://saugoreebsc.blogspot.com/ and my Hindi blog at http://wahajuana.blogspot.com/